Written by: Khaliq Yar Ahmadzai
Khalilzad, a figure who has played on various fields for the United States, is considered one of the most well-known American figures in the United States, the region, and the world.
Khalilzad, who in recent years, against expectations, brought the US-led negotiations with the Islamic Emirate to a results. His Afghan friends, who were apparently deeply separated from him, were in such a state of political discourse within the country that their internal conflicts sometimes escalated from bottles to cannons, and at other times, even in an atmosphere of intimacy, they couldn’t quench their thirst with green tea.
Khalilzad’s friends turned against him because he allegedly intentionally sprinkled pepper in their precious sugar, permanently removing them from government positions and closing the doors to their desires.
Yes! Zalmay Khalilzad, who served as Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense in the United States from 1990-1992, and who was praised by these Afghan thugs as a good American friend.
This same Khalilzad, who was the head of strategy at the RAND Corporation’s consulting center from 1993-2000, was later responsible for the twenty-year quagmire of the invasion of Afghanistan, which resulted from the center’s advice.
Khalilzad, who served as the US ambassador to Afghanistan from 2003-2005, provided a constitutional cover for the Afghan-looking militias who were imposed on him, and they also presented him with a medal named after Amanullah Khan; these included Atta Noor, Khalili, Sayyaf, and others. From guest houses to the gathering places of the Karzais, Massouds, and Amrullah Salehs, everyone was lined up to welcome this esteemed guest.
So, when he successfully conducted negotiations with the Islamic Emirate as the US Special Representative for Afghanistan Peace from 2018-2021, and the negotiations resulted in the end of the international infidel occupation, it was the very same old friends of yesterday who opposed today by his companions.
As the freedom of expression was wrongly twisted, this old man was punished in the very rural literature that was wrongly injected into them.
What is The Main Problem?
It is believed that everyone has spiritual values and that ingrained thoughts are not repairable; this same sown seed yielded a bad result for Khalilzad.
It’s right! American strategists and Zionist thinkers had drawn up evil and dangerous plans for Islamic countries around the world, but this Afghan-born elder did not need to use the same written idea here verbatim. This man had called the imported friends he brought with him and Afghan-origin expatriates like himself “reliable shovels,” which ultimately resulted in neither the shovels gaining strength nor the supporting handles they threw in remaining firm.
Khalilzad and his masters at the time wanted to institutionalize democracy, secularism, and the American version in general here using appointed American shovels; they wanted the same people to be accepted by the public as model rulers and to present a show of the arrogant regime to the world. After trillions of dollars and unprecedented bloodshed, it became clear that the government claiming authority over the condemned territory was imaginary and as empty as a hot air balloon; prioritizing foreign interests was for the survival of its imaginary position, and it was prepared to trade away the country’s territorial integrity, national treasures, and religious structures for a small amount of this commodity.
After years of war and countless losses, American authorities realized that the nation had risen up against them and that those who loot dollar cows were not capable of offering them hope for a better future. So they once again sent the experienced diplomat, with whom the entire occupying herd came to the negotiating table truly humbled.
The thoughts that were distorted as a result of their (America’s) investment are now hitting back and even turning against their former supporters like Khalilzad.
You will have seen that Khalilzad is often focused on giving Pakistan rational advice and considers the TTP’s resistance an internal problem for Pakistan, proposing a political solution to prevent it. His own statements condemn the very Democrats who, until yesterday, presented themselves to the public as anti-Punjab figures; before Khalilzad could respond to Punjab, he was condemned by those same Afghan-looking anti-Punjab figures from yesterday.
The same people who saw the market for democracy as an upward trend now don’t even approve of an Islamic system for their former enemy (Pakistan) and consider it a kind of setback.
Yes! In democratic countries, individual and sexual freedom is everyone’s right, but within an Islamic framework where everything is balanced and limited, these very liberated ideas can not be tolerated.
Khalilzad, who praises the progress made under the current system, is right; because during his tenure as envoy, the US pulled its feet out of the quagmire of war, otherwise, the economy would have been even more unprecedentedly stagnant.
Khalilzad’s position may have been drawn in light of American interests, as an independent Afghanistan in the region is more valuable to the US than one under the shadow of any superpower’s rule.
His former teammates are criticizing this stance because they have left the field and are currently far from their positions, working in dirty clothes in European countries.
Some of Khalilzad’s conscious opponents are those whose mouths are full of the countries where their interests were somehow protected here.
Those who freely extracted Badakhshan gold, Panjshir emeralds, and other valuable minerals from the country at the price of poppy, how will they be able to explain that the thorn of yesterday’s profits remains stuck in their throats, so they will utter their cries of despair from the mouths of the invited Afghan-like beggars.
Although Khalilzad is still an American official and heads a consulting firm, he must atone in his later years for the direction that caused suffering for Afghans and Afghanistan. He needs to attract global attention to resolving Afghanistan’s political problems and transforming Afghanistan into an economic crossroads with the global village.
Similarly, those Afghan-looking politicians who have taken refuge outside the country is that they advised everyone to unite and show solidarity with the country and the ruling system, otherwise, they should encourage the host countries to hand them over to the wind of expulsion.
Domestically, tangible use should be made of him in areas that open the way for political and economic interactions with the world.
Note: The articles, essays, and comments published by the Voice of Hindukush only reflect the views of the authors & writers and do not necessarily represent the agreement of the Voice of Hindukush.
